bossymarmalade: maha lakshmi (multiple arms = more fun & efficient)
[Asian Women Blog Carnival #1]



sita pays her dues


"Is that your new doggie? She's so adorable!" I tell my co-worker Cathy, and she smiles and declares, "she's a golden doodle."

I peer at the photograph, making out ears and nose and paws amid the bundle of honey-coloured puppy cradled in her owner's arms, and Cathy ventures, "We're thinking of naming her Karma."

---

I know about three separate women who call themselves "Kali". They are all white. I don't know any Indian women named Kali, because it is a name that brings very heavy associations with it that most parents don't want to burden their little girls with. I've come across even more white women calling themselves Kali when it comes to paganism and the occult, all sorts of articles advising pantheists to aspect Kali in order to get rid of negative influences in their lives or explaining why she's not so scary despite her tongue and her wild eyes and her girdle of skulls. No, they assure the reader, she's basically the Morrigan with a dot on her forehead, just a Hindu version of the Crone.

---

Elizabeth Gilbert heads to India for the "pray" segment of her best-selling book Eat, Pray, Love; she goes to an ashram and has a lot of wacky adventures trying to concentrate on the tedious prayers, talking to a fellow American for the *real* scoop on enlightenment, and fetishizing a photograph of an Indian woman whom she never meets but whom she insists is her "guru".

Nina Paley reads the Ramayan and doesn't like it. She thinks that Prince Rama's devoted consort Sita is "too submissive". Then her husband dumps her, and suddenly Sita's story becomes something else: a discourse upon which Paley can inscribe her own feelings and perceptions, a beautiful exotic therapy session called Sita Sings the Blues that will win her awards and acclaim.

---

I am tired of this. I am tired of white women using my words, my concepts, my goddesses and my stories and my clothing and my food for their own fulfillment, ignorant of the context of oppression and imperialism, and then telling me I should be happy about it. I'm tired of the Pussycat Dolls wearing bindis and nose-rings, tired of air fresheners helping people to "plug into their karma", tired of the disassociation of yoga from Hinduism among its fans and sneers about its chants and poses among its detractors.

Let me tell you my truth. )




thanks to [livejournal.com profile] ciderpress for the space to talk.
bossymarmalade: lisa simpson is determined (yet another cause to champion)
On boycotts/girlcotts:

ETA for clarity: I just read a post (not linking, since this isn't a call to go argue or anything) expressing dismay over the "Thought Policing" in somebody else posting a public list of authors she won't be reading after seeing them fail all over the place this past couple months.

This made me think about the many, many things I "boycott" on an ongoing basis -- seriously, just ask my friends how I respond to simple requests to buy a Coke or go to Wal-Mart or watch Supernatural and see their eyes roll -- and what my purpose is behind that avoidance. I mean, just because I try to avoid buying Kraft products doesn't mean the company's in any danger of going out of business (not that this would be my goal, b/c hell, macaroni & cheese!) but they're not even close to my more accurate wish that they'd not be owned by Altria aka Phillip Morris. My denying myself those little blue boxes doesn't make any difference to them.

But I can't in good conscience support them. (note: i do not mean to sound superior, there are plenty of ways i give money to rotten things, i think we all have our own personal sets of not-alloweds.) There's something about these products that upsets *me* in a fundamental way.

I feel the same way about boycotting some of the authors who've been failing it up. I'm not doing it to punish or silence or send a message to them. They are the very least of my concerns. I'm avoiding their books because after seeing how they deal with real live people who are telling them, "hey, this hurts", I have no interest in seeking out their work so they can hurt me some more in a one-way medium. My boycott is my own political protest, and as the personal is political, what could be more personal than wanting the things I read/watch/buy for fun being actual FUN instead of being painful?

So while I understand that for some people, seeing these lists of boycotted authors/publishers elicits concern for, say, the more clueful Tor authors, I don't think we need to get too worried for their livelihoods or reputations. The no-buy lists are not the same thing as a slam book (HOLY SHIT Y'ALL DO YOU REMEMBER SLAM BOOKS I STILL HAVE ONE) and I wish there was a word besides "boycott" we could use, one that doesn't bring the baggage of "ostracism" with it. Because for lots of people, like myself, I would hazard a guess that boycotting is not even about punitive action.

It's about choosing what I want to allow into my space, and what I have the desire or non-desire to deal with. And I have as much right to talk publicly about what I don't like and why, as you have to talk publicly about the same thing and why and how much you like it.

Besides, I have to save up my energy to do some good hard protesting of the Avatar movie when it comes out and has heroic white people instead of heroic brown people! AAAARGH.
bossymarmalade: cleese and chapman are unamused (pepperpots are not amused)
Okay, um ... between Elizabeth Bear's Cease Fire post and [livejournal.com profile] annafdd's new one here, are people just ... not understanding what Swift was getting at when he wrote "A Modest Proposal"? Is there some kind of group-consciousness misconception going on, like how bunches of people thought Jimi Hendrix was singing "'scuse me while i kiss this guy'? Because SERIOUSLY NOW Y'ALL. Somebody explain this to me (hopefully through a comment that grasps the concept of satire).

Also: I was catching up on comments and [livejournal.com profile] on_earth enlightened me as to Avatar movie casting director DeeDee Ricketts' self-satisfied touting of her "skillz" as published on her website. Go look, it's a guaranteed good time.

disclaimer: "good time" may be understood to mean "laughing in disbelief that somebody could be so stupid" OR "tearing your hair out by the roots" OR "wondering how people like this are allowed drivers' licenses much less careers".

In closing, I liked this with regard to people getting pissed about being "pressured" to post about RaceFail 09. I don't think everybody needs to post. People process things in different ways. But taking the time to write a big angry screed detailing all the reasons you haven't and won't, paired with silence on the actual issues? What the hell is the point?
bossymarmalade: lisa simpson gets going (cautiously gung-ho!)
I am still sort of reeling (in a good way!) from all of the gloriously generous comments that people -- people I've known forever and love dearly, people I've never met who are gently connecting with me -- are leaving in my last post. What a tremendous affirmation of our voices and our community, and I am so honoured to have it in my space!

Which leads me to this: every time I sit down at the computer since I wrote that and think, "I can start responding now!", I look at all of these voices and all those little icons, and I end up re-reading and laughing and crying and just feeling overall wonderful. And then I put it off, because the minute I start responding, everything's going to go into collapsed threads!

[livejournal.com profile] sailorcoruscant said (somewhere on the tenth page): "It's taken a few days for me to realise I could (and probably should) come back and break radio silence to tell you that you (and your readers) have a beautiful voices. This growing chorus is a wonderful thing."

And I thought, yes, yesyesyes. And I realized I didn't want to collapse those beautiful voices.

So I'm going to hold myself back from answering, but oh man, I would have given all of you so much love. Wait, I can do that here!!

♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥


Thank you all so very much. If there's anything you said in that post that you want a response to, just bring it up in the comments of this post and we'll natter away with no worries about collapsed threads. *g*

sees fire

Mar. 4th, 2009 11:34 pm
bossymarmalade: blue eye with lashes of red flower petals (Default)
Oh, Internet.

It used to be good. I thought it was good, because I didn't really know better (although I knew enough to use a pseudonym, because I am a woman of colour and I was young), and I thought you really listened. I thought we were the same.

Then you started behaving hurtfully. I suspected it was my fault, my lack of education or my colonized mindset or any number of things I've been raised to feel ashamed about, but I had to face the facts.

You were full of people who saw me as shallow, or nothing, or lacking "good faith". And I decided it was getting too hard to be with you anymore.




You see, I couldn't just decide not to have a conversation about race anymore, because it follows me home. My race issues ARE my home. Other people can pick them up when they want to look at something shiny, something exotic tasty foreign bright colourful strange exciting; they toss them around, try them on. Start to explain them to me and find different names for them, like classism and learning experience.

And then they get confused that those race issues, shiny, aren't also malleable submissive accepting pliant silent cowed controllable; they drop them, scowling, and complain that I should have warned them they might get pricked, especially as they were so well-meaning in their actions.

Well, I say, maybe you shouldn't touch things before you learn about them or know how to treat them with respect.




The funny thing is, I ended up making more friends than anything else from this fight. Because I was finally able to see that I *wasn't* alone in feeling the way I did, and even though some white "progressives" will panic and act poorly when they think they're being accused of racism, actual white allies will not. They will stick around and apologize if they've hurt me, and they won't pretend that they're the Only Brave Ones who Speak The Truth, and they'll make a real undeniable *effort* to own their privilege and not co-opt spaces in discussions that aren't about them.

I realized that how pseudonymous people act on the internet to each other is an excellent marker of their good conscience.




And the whole *other* set of friends I met? They're not golden-skinned, not exactly, but their hearts and minds are a different matter. They, like me, go home with their race issues and live them and love them and know that for all the pain there, our complex intersecting dark light in-between loud proud strong wounded eloquent issues were also a place of comfort and pleasure and beauty. When they say things I'm unsure about, I don't assume they missed something; I assume I have something to learn. I've read their joys and their laughter and found that they understand the cathartic power of mocking the wilfully ignorant, because this is (one of the many) coping strategies that chromatic people have developed, valid even if outsiders don't understand. I found that there was an entire new vocabulary opening up to me, words that felt round and sour-salt and soft in my mouth, nestling in my cheek and throat to wait until the time I'd need them.

I didn't realize how many people would listen to me speak and offer me love.




I don't make modest proposals (because I have never seen anybody appropriate Swift and do it properly).

And I would never dream of telling anybody to "let it drop" when what "it" is ... is themselves.

My good conscience is intact, because it stands in companionship with all of you. The people allowed into my space have been supportive and investigative and witty and wise, and I cherish that because I know, now, the value of safe space. As well as the value of maintaining a voice no matter what, and the way a community can hold you up when you feel all slumpy and disillusioned.

I tend to wryness more than to sentiment, dear ones, but I cannot help but feel as though this is a gorgeous moment, right here. We're having conversations. We're going to keep having them. There's a whole big internet out here for us to finally talk.

This is my voice: maggie, brown and soft and sour-salt.

I want to hear yours, now and for the longest while.




follow-up, and why i decided not to reply to comments here
bossymarmalade: a man in moko jumbie mud (moko jumbies are my entourage)
So Kathryn Cramer says that all people who use web aliases are criminals, because the only reason to have a pseudonym is to feel more free to act in horrible ways on the internet.

Then she moves her post around, misdirects the links, and posts [livejournal.com profile] coffeeandink's full name on her blog. Which is, as we all know, a horrible way to act on the internet.

Then Will Shetterly decides to:
- also out [livejournal.com profile] coffeeandink and then demand apologies and praise from her when he does the bare minimum of taking down her surname
- use results from a google search about India to speculate on [livejournal.com profile] deepad's life situations, and quotes from Gandhi to supposedly enforce his "point"

Then his wife Emma Bull gets stroppy at somebody who's concerned about Shetterly having access to their personal info and starts lecturing about how it's unfair to judge him only by the horrible way he's acted the internet.

Then Elizabeth Bear runs around telling people (LIKE DEEPA HERSELF, WTF) that Will is actually so nice in real life, it's just ... he feels free to act in horrible ways on the internet.

Somebody is failing hard here.

And please note that Shetterly and Cramer and Co. have now reimagined the entire point of RaceFail 09 to be about internet pseudonymity instead of representations of race. Their insistence on focusing on the activities of white allies, repeatedly attempting to spread the meme that all of their critics are "East-coast upper-class Ivy Leaguers" (read: white), is yet another cowardly and slimy attempt to erase the presence of chromatic people in this discussion. We saw it when mac_stone and medievalist and Bear tried to pretend that there was a "maximum of twenty" disgruntled people, we're seeing it again with this fiction that internet fucking pseudonyms are the crux of the matter. They've realized that they can't attack fen of colour and still look like heroes, so they're trying to find some other way to imagine the Enemy.

Although, if you recall Cramer's original post wherein she posited that using her real name was proof that she indeed was, as she claimed to be, a "slim blonde woman in upstate NY" instead of a "fat black man in the Arizona desert", you'll see that they're still not doing so good at hiding their racism.

[livejournal.com profile] spiralsheep's suggestion that as a community we shun them is the one I'm following. I hope never to have cause to mention them in my journal again (and that goes for Elizabeth Bear too, who has often been held up as some sort of "voice of reason" in RaceFail but whose constant apologist behaviour for her douchey friends and false iteration of "bad behaviour on both sides" says something quite different).
bossymarmalade: a man in moko jumbie mud (moko jumbies are my entourage)
Just in case any of y'all were led to believe that using the word "slumdog" to refer to Indian people is fun, jokey slang, please ... don't.

http://navia.livejournal.com/220989.html

http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2009/02/26/slums-are-for-lovers/

http://www.musicindiaonline.com/n/i/top_stories/2867/ (ETA: I include this last one for his account of the term being used, not b/c I necessarily agree with his views on Mumbai.)
bossymarmalade: homer simpson sticking a weiner in his eye (you make me feel like this)
... are people just losing their goddamn MINDS lately?!?






Thanks for that, Miley Cyrus.
bossymarmalade: bart simpson hopes for a prize in the cereal box (you gotta be lucky *sometime*)
I love how when people like anna post a long, smart post about the repeating patterns of race discussions vis-à-vis Carol Thatcher and RaceFail 09, inevitably somebody will show up with comments not about the thought-provoking exploration of race politics and society, but asking, "what's a golliwog?" Despite anna putting TWO LINKS right next to the word so people could educate themselves before joining the conversation.

At this point it's like ALL discussions of race that aren't Racism 101 should come with disclaimers. I'm taking mine from Wyclef Jean's "Anything Can Happen":

Take this lesson to your next session
I suggest you practice with the freshmen
Sophomore, junior, then come check the senior
By then I would have graduated from the school of ruckus


I totally thought of this song when I read the reiterated bit of Willow's post and hell, it seems like a better and better idea by the moment.

In other news!! The people making the crappy whitewashed Avatar movie have turfed Jesse McCartney and replaced him with Dev Patel. Yay! ... except that Patel will be the Japanese-based bad-guy character (instead of brown-skinned Inuit goofball Sokka, which, um, DEV PATEL!! Shouldn't this be OBVIOUS?!?!) As the sister says, this is not a change that shows the producers understand their racism, it's tokenism so they can point to the lone brown dude and say, "hey, lookit, we're not racist!"

Anyhow, this campaign is clearly not over. Lori has set up an awesome Zazzle store that sells Avatar protest shirts/postcards/buttons, and she has also made all of her excellent graphics available free if you want to do your own printing and whatnot!

Profile

bossymarmalade: blue eye with lashes of red flower petals (Default)
miss maggie

November 2021

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21 222324 252627
282930    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags