miss maggie (
bossymarmalade) wrote2009-02-27 11:10 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
this isn't very convenient
Just in case any of y'all were led to believe that using the word "slumdog" to refer to Indian people is fun, jokey slang, please ... don't.
http://navia.livejournal.com/220989.html
http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2009/02/26/slums-are-for-lovers/
http://www.musicindiaonline.com/n/i/top_stories/2867/ (ETA: I include this last one for his account of the term being used, not b/c I necessarily agree with his views on Mumbai.)
http://navia.livejournal.com/220989.html
http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2009/02/26/slums-are-for-lovers/
http://www.musicindiaonline.com/n/i/top_stories/2867/ (ETA: I include this last one for his account of the term being used, not b/c I necessarily agree with his views on Mumbai.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
the fact that i think it's a complete and utter joke aside, i'm so ragey idek what to do with myself. like it's not bad enough this movie is getting (undeserved) acclaim for sending out all the wrong kinds of ideas about a situation that isn't even remotely, remotely hopeful or uplifting, the acclaim from hollywood stays in hollywood and the kids in india, the ones who need it, and the ones you'd think would be benefitting from having their story told - however mangled - are back in the slums, still left with nothing, and it is just so. UGH.
i'm sorry, i will stop invading your journal now!
no subject
I half-watched the movie with my family and my sister and I agreed that it wasn't bad, but it wasn't anything special; it's the very fact that it's a familiar story that takes place in "exotic India" that has drawn such a big Western audience. I think people recognize the tropes and are excited by the trappings.
Basically, I have totally mixed feelings about the movie and what exactly it represents to the West about Indian people, and you hit on some of my issues exactly! So I am glad you left a comment, bb.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(I should add that I totally appreciate that film is at heart a money-making industry. However, I feel that if you turn to the misfortunes of others for your story idea, and profit significantly from it, it's just unethical to not use some of that money to in some way try to address the misfortunes.)
I mean, I think they did mention that the families of the children are getting houses(?), and there's some kind of educational trust fund for the kids - but that doesn't seem enough to me. I would like to see some of the movie funds going to set up something to help EVERYONE in that situation. Perhaps to some kind of educational facility, or medical clinic. I suspect the kind of cash the movie could justify donating would make a BIG difference to some charitable groups working in the area.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I had assumed 'slumdog' was derogatory. Like 'guttersnipe' or 'white trash'.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
people puzzle me, a lot.
no subject
no subject
Erm... thank you for informing me, I think? :-/
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Your icon, however, is incredible!)
(no subject)
no subject
uggggggh. :/ :/ :/ i hate how voyeuristic it is - if you watch a movie about all the poor brown people in a slum, you truly understand exactly how life is in ALL OF INDIA! maybe even for ALL BROWN PEOPLE EVERYWHERE ALWAYS!
I can see how the title could be ironic/meant to draw a contrast between stereotype and reality, but the fact that the people honored for the movie were all white, combined with the fact that the movie's popular right now because of its success with the Western, racist movie market, pretty much destroys whatever intent it might've had.
no subject
that the people honored for the movie were all white
except for AR Rahman, who won 3 of the 8 oscars. He's been honored for plenty already, but not by the Academy. Does he finally count as famous yet, i wonder?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
I swear, Oprah is just losing her damn grip on appropriate responses more and more every day. I saw that one where she was talking to a girl from Mauritania who was explaining that women are expected to be heavy there, to the extent that some women were taking veterinary drugs to put on weight and how diabetes was a real problem, and all Oprah could do was sing, "I'M MOVING TO MAURITANIA, MAU-RI-TAI-NI-AAAAAAA!" and I was like, what the fuck, lady.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
What part of 'slumdog' can anyone think is not an insult?
Who'd have thought that a major 'little battler', overcoming adversity role wouldn't get a best actor nomination? I guess Tom Hanks must truly be the actor the Academy thinks he is. How wrong I was in my cynicism!
no subject
WIN!
no subject
Yes, I agree with those posts. Slumdogs does sound like it is being used as a derogative term whereas the intention in the title of the movie appears to have been ironic (in my opinion, you don't have to agree with me on that part). It's pretty much unthinkable to me that people are referring to Indians as slumdogs, it's obviously a negative term. Uncool but it's the way the world works. We can only tell people and hope they change. Thanks for letting me know.
Lastly, I personally don't agree with everything that Srivastava says in the third entry. I don't think the movie is showing the ugly side of India at all - in fact, I think poverty is something that should be highlighted about South Asian countries. Again, that's a personal opinion. That interview also shows how normal words can mutate and become ugly with changes to culture. 'Gora' (in Britain anyway) is used by the Indian community in a slightly racist way, the way someone might say 'Oh he's a whiteboy'. Not everyone, but some.
I'm heading to bed now but I'd like to hear what you think if you wanna reply back.
no subject
I don't agree with everything Srivastava says either; that link's mostly there for his account of hearing "slumdog" used to address/describe desis in the US. There's certainly a lot of resistance from Indians about the poverty that exists in the country; even though we're Caribbean desis and not directly implicated, my mom *refuses* to watch movies that portray India in any sort of uncomplimentary light because she's so invested in pretending the slums are some kind of natural occurrence and not helped along by South Asian elites.
And I hear you on the shifting meanings of words; in North America "coolie" is mostly used to refer historically to Chinese field-workers and doesn't seem to be hugely offensive (although I could be wrong on that), but in my experience in Trinidad it was equivalent to the n-word when it came to insulting Indian people!
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Also, GOP WHAT ARE YOU DOING?!? IT IS BREAKING MY BRAIN.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Anyway...
I'm just waiting for someone to come up with a "Slumdog Yoga" exercise video so I can orc the fuck out on some dumbass.
People know perfectly well that this a derogatory term. Ultimately this speaks a lot to just how terrified these fools are to see immigrant financial and political success, especially now.